Microsoft Releases Spyware Removal Program
 | ||
 | Email weblog link | |
 | Discuss | |
 | Blog this |
Ming Chow
Jan. 06, 2005 09:06 AM
Permalink
URL: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=321cd7a2-6a57-4c57...
An interesting way for Microsoft to start of the new year indeed. The application is called Microsoft Windows AntiSpyware, currently a beta version. The download page touts the new program as:
[Windows AntiSpyware (Beta) is] a security technology that helps protect Windows users from spyware and other potentially unwanted software. Known spyware on your PC can be detected and removed. This helps reduce negative effects caused by spyware including slow PC performance, annoying pop-up ads, unwanted changes to Internet settings, and unauthorized use of your private information. Continuous protection improves Internet browsing safety by guarding over 50 ways spyware can enter your PC.
This news was obviously an eye-opener when I first saw the news on Slashdot. I am highly curious about this move by Microsoft. In particular:
- Is Microsoft's business going reactive? First, they finally decided to incorporate a (more visible) firewall in the operating system, which is not a novel concept (Linux and Mac OS X were already ahead of the game). I say that the firewall in SP2 is "more visible" because there actually was a way to enable a "firewall" in the original XP, though not really publicized to the general public. Now, a spyware removal program, which again, is not a novel concept. What's next, Microsoft's own anti-virus program?
- How good is this new spyware program compared to Ad-Aware, Spybot, etc., which already exist, are popular, and are reasonably effective? Will this put companies such as Lavasoft (publisher of Ad-Aware) out of business?
The most important question I have is:
- What does this say about Microsoft? The message that I am getting from this message is that: "Hey, Microsoft Windows is a highly vulnerable operating system, and spyware and viruses can easily propagate through it." My point is, if an operating system is reasonably secure and designed correctly, then such spyware application and a plethora of third-party security utilities are not necessary. Even worse, Microsoft admits that their new spyware removal program is buggy. A buggy software on top of buggy software is not a good thing.
My skepticism on Microsoft's move may sound a bit harsh. The good thing about this is that Microsoft is making the initiative to do something about the spyware problem. Most importantly, "not a lot of people understand what spyware is or how to contain it, that should change when a computer giant such as Microsoft brings it to the attention of the masses" (thanks St. Clown).
Ming Chow is a scholar of science and technology, whose areas of interests are computer security, game development, and Computer Science in education.
Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4.
-
Microsoft Antivirus
2005-01-06 14:03:35 aristotle [Reply | View]
This actually existed way back in the day of MS-DOS 6.22. History obviously repeats as a farce…
-
for an alternate view...
2005-01-06 13:21:15 merlyn [Reply | View]
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/05/Jan/spyware.html
| Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4. |
Return to weblogs.oreilly.com.
Weblog authors are solely responsible for the content and accuracy of their weblogs, including opinions they express, and O'Reilly Media, Inc., disclaims any and all liabililty for that content, its accuracy, and opinions it may contain.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.
Well, why do you think it's still beta? If they were reasonably certain they'd all the bugs out of it they'd have released it as a complete product, not a beta.
Your entire post sounds like just another attempt to slam Microsoft whatever they do or don't.
A few days ago you (or a colleague) complained that Microsoft does nothing against spyware, now you complain that they do...
If Linux were the main OS people were using that would draw the majority of spyware authors. If a large enough percentage of users move to Firefox as a browser the crackers will start to exploit that (there's more outstanding serious security issues for FF than there are for IE yet the time to fix is longer for FF than it is for IE making it a potentially highly lucrative platform for malware authors were it not that the userbase of intended victims is too small to make it commercially viable...).
It all sounds incredibly childish from a group of people I largely respect as professionals.